|
Post by washingtongm on Apr 6, 2007 22:55:25 GMT -5
Why was my deal rejected? wcb07.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=rejected&action=display&thread=1175640951&page=1-Bergman=Hansen, Lester=Belliard+Karp, King>Rasmus so my trade gets rejected, while the following get passed: wcb07.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=passed&action=display&thread=1175878593-Wang, Zumaya, and Proctor for a pile of nothing. wcb07.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=passed&action=display&thread=1175806737-Dice-K for a pile of poop and a decent starter in Garcia. wcb07.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=passed&action=display&thread=1175789995-Hafner for 4 and 3.5 specs. wcb07.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=passed&action=display&thread=1175660165-Lidge>Ryan, Jennings>Chacin, Ensburg>Glaus, fair how? Yup, those are all really fair[/sarcasm]. My post in the rejected thread was deleted, and I've received no explanation. Sorry, but I don't think I'll be sticking around a league where commishes get to rape people without question and fair deals like mine get vetoed. So unless I get some sort of explanation that makes this all better, I'm out. -First my post in the trade thread gets deleted, then this gets deleted to so I have to repost it. What is this censorship, are we living in Stalin's Russia?
|
|
|
Post by bluejaysgm on Apr 6, 2007 23:01:39 GMT -5
We have nothing to explain. We voided it, it's as simple as that. If you want to quit, be my guest, your always welcomed to come back.
|
|
|
Post by washingtongm on Apr 6, 2007 23:05:20 GMT -5
Well I think there's something to explain when deals CLEARLY more lopsided than mine get passed, especially when commishes are passing their own somewhat lopsided deals. It simply isn't consistant.
|
|
|
Post by floridagm on Apr 8, 2007 18:55:09 GMT -5
Ok you know what, I'm sticking up for Mark here. They vetoed trades they thought weren't good. They passed what they thought was good. CLEARLY, your pissed because your trade didn't get passed. nuts happens, rework the deal, and deal with it.
|
|
|
Post by washingtongm on Apr 8, 2007 22:49:06 GMT -5
It's not that they vetoed my deal, that really doesn't bother me, it's that they aren't consistant. If someone could explain how my deal, or even the others that have been vetoed, are any worse than some of the stuff the Commishes themselves are pulling off and not vetoing, then I'd be fine.
|
|